| Columbus Wired
- Central
Ohio's Premier Online Magazine |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Oscar-palooza!
by Stephanie Morgan, Columbus Wired Columnist (3/18/03)
Okay, a small rip-off, but this is the season. For those that
think the mathematical permutations of last year’s football
playoffs were complicated, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
The Oscars are meant to award the best of the best in film from
the last year. Twenty-Four categories are meant to honor those
that truly deserve to be called the best.
Sounds simple, doesn’t it? But it’s not that simple. Several
hundred films are released each year, and the clamoring for
nominations begins early. You might have even noticed one or two
films advertised as “the first Oscar-worthy film of 2003.” But
being good isn’t all that it takes. Like any good contest, there
are always controversies and politics at play.
Before you think it’s all bunk, remember that people that actually
do that job nominate nominations in all of the categories (save
Best Picture). In other words, actors nominate actors and editors
nominate editors. (So understand that just being nominated really
is an honor.) However, all Academy members vote in the end and
save a few exceptions, no one has to even prove that they’ve seen
any of the films, much less understand the categories.
Well, I’m here to handicap all twenty-four nominations. Since
there’s more to it than simply being the best, I’ve broken down
the following key elements:
Past Oscar Nominations: You can never ignore the past with Oscar.
Sometimes you have the “new kid” factor on your hand, other times
you have the “institution” factor on your side.
Past Wins: Everybody loves a winner. As long as you don’t win too
many times, because that’s just greedy. Included in this are wins
from other award shows. After all, Oscar doesn’t like being the
last one in the world to recognize that someone’s the best.
Pass-Overs: If there is something everyone loves, it’s going on
and on about whether you should have won before but were
passed-over due to political reasons. Oscar loves to pay back for
sins of omission.
The Miramax Factor: Miramax spends more than anyone on their Oscar
campaigns. This is the studio that dethroned “Saving Private Ryan”
by convincing academy voters that “Shakespeare In Love” was the
best film of the year.
Hip Factor: There are times Oscar is accused of being stodgy and
in love with films that the general public has no interest in
really seeing. Every year, one or two awards are given simply to
prove that the Academy is “hip.”
Number of Nominations: If a film has been nominated for multiple
Oscars, this can work against winning some awards as the
assumption can become “they will probably win another award, so we
can give this award to someone else” mentality. But not always.
Intangibles: Just like in all good contests, there are those
things that are not easily categorized (nor apply to everyone) but
will have a tremendous impact on the outcome.
For the Acting and Directing Categories, there will be one
additional factor.
Age: Oscar is constantly reminded of the people that never won the
award – Alfred Hitchcock, Marilyn Monroe, Cary Grant, etc. You
never know when one of our elder entertainers will leave for the
Great Studio In The Sky, so sometimes the Academy gives them a
statue to say “thanks” for a long and wonderful career.
|
|
|
|
|